Legal Opinion

Brisacher v. Baier

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1924No. 2665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff recovered judgment in this action for $3,081.50 against the defendants Philip Baier, E. A. McCord and F. H. Smith, and Ed. L. Harper, who defaulted. The action was dismissed as to the defendant A. J. Pearce, who was not served. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury. The defendants Baier, M'cCord and Smith appeal.

The complaint contains two causes of action, one of which is based upon the claim of plaintiff for services alleged to have been performed by him for defendants and for money advanced for their account, and the other cause of action is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strause v. Richmond Woodworking Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  2. Leake v. City of VeniceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Hersey v. TullyColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Ijams v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Duker v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Allen v. Packer CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API