Ijams v. Andrews
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the' District of Indiana. ' ■ The plaintiffs in error were five of seven defendants named in the complaint of the defendant in error, in a suit to recover the amount of advances made by the Vigo County National Bank for their alleged use and benefit, and the writ of error is prosecuted from a judgment therein against the plaintiffs in error and another defendant, Gustav A. Conzman, who defaulted and declined to join in…
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the' District of Indiana. ' ■ The plaintiffs in error were five of seven defendants named in the complaint of the defendant in error, in a suit to recover the amount of advances made by the Vigo County National Bank for their alleged use and benefit, and the writ of error is prosecuted from a judgment therein against the plaintiffs in error and another defendant, Gustav A. Conzman, who defaulted and declined to join in the writ. The remaining defendant named in the complaint was one tJeorge E. West, who was not made a party by service or…
1Opinion of the CourtSeaman, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts). The facts in this controversy, as found by the trial court, are not challenged, and error is assigned alone upon the conclusions of law. It is contended on behalf of the plaintiffs in error that no individual liability was created against them under the facts stated, and that the money was loaned either upon corporate credit, or upon the credit of the purported notes of Miller and West. On the other hand, the defendant in" error contends that recovery is authorized upon the. conceded facts of the association of the plaintiffs in error, as co-adventurers, both in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- White v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Brisacher v. BaierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hartsough v. HirshheimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922