Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Eastman
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1984No. B002528PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
Defendant, Richard Eastman (Eastman), appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and cross-complainant, Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California (Interinsurance), based on an order granting State Farm’s and Interinsurance’s motions for summary judgment.
On May 25, 1980, Eastman was involved in a single vehicle accident while driving a dune buggy which belonged to his brother-in-law, Lynn P. Jensen (Jensen). Eastman and several passengers were injured in the accident. Eastman had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- ACS Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jauregui v. Mid-Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Visueta v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. Westlake Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.