Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2001No. CV-99-0388-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, we are asked to review a court of appeals opinion affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (Philadelphia). Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Barerra, 196 Ariz. 391, 998 P.2d 1064 (App.1999). We granted review to determine the validity of a driving-under-the-influence (DUI) exclusion from the insurance coverage obtained as part of a car rental transaction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Constitution article 6, § 5.3 and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. TIG Insurance v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Collins v. RandallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API