Legal Opinion

Harry v. Fairlane Club Properties, Ltd

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1983No. Docket 54757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, James and Beverly Harry, appeal the denial of their motion for a new trial.

On June 20, 1979, following a lengthy trial, a jury found that plaintiffs had established no cause of action against defendants Fairlane Club Properties, Ltd., Webster-Buell, Inc., and Nordstrom-Samson and Associates. Plaintiffs’ immediate motion for mistrial, based in part on the failure to send certain exhibits to the jury room during deliberations, was denied by Judge Horace W. Gilmore, the trial judge. On June 20, 1980, Judge Gilmore filed a written opinion in which he found that he had erred in not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Socha v. PassinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kailimai v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Winekoff v. PospisilMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HerbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. WaltersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Totzkay v. DuBOIS)Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. HerbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API