Skinner v. Shirley of Hollywood
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Defendant seeks to dismiss this diversity action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted with respect to Count V of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, and denied with respect to the remainder of plaintiffs’ complaint.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs Craig Skinner and Charles Skinner, d/b/a Charles Skinner and Associates (“Skinner”), are in the business of representing manufacturers of women’s lingerie and apparel. Defendant Shirley of Hollywood (“Shirley”), a division of National Corset Supply House, is a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. ANC Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- C-B Realty & Trading Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Hassebrock v. CEJA CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Allied Vision Group, Inc. v. RLI Professional Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.