Hilts v. Ladd
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union : Stephen A. Lowell, Judge. Suit to impeach a decree by Rachel M. Hilts against Freeman S. Ladd and Mary A. Ladd. From a decree setting aside the former decree, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is a suit to impeach and set aside a decree of this court on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and comes here on an appeal from a decree granting the relief demanded. In brief, the facts are that in October, 1893, Homer Nessley, Frank Nessley, and Charles Nessley, being in possession of certain lands in Union County, and claiming to own the same in fee under a warranty deed from the plaintiff, brought a suit in the circuit court of that county against the present defendant to *239quiet their title to such lands, which resulted adversely to them. They subsequently appealed to this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McDougald's Adm'r v. DoughertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1864
- Livingston v. HubbsNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Craig v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kimberly v. ArmsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. v. SartoriWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Barz v. SawyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- McLeod v. LloydOregon Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.