Legal Opinion

Kimberly v. Arms

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided November 22, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Equity. On application for leave to file a bill of review.

1Opinion of the CourtJacicsox, J.

Under and in pursuance of a mandate of the supreme court of the United States, a final decree in favor of complainant, Kimberly, was entered in'this cause in May, 1889. The defendants Arms and wife now make application to this court for leave to file a bill of review, for the purpose of vacating and setting aside that decree. The grounds chiefly relied on for annulling said decree, as set forth in the bill of review sought to be filed, are alleged errors of law apparent on the face of the record, newly-discovered evidence, and fraud on the part of Kimberly in procuring said decree. It appears…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Vance v. BurbankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Halbrook v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. Society of Shakers v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Nessley v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API