Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Robert Quinn, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of February, 1901, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term. The action was brought to obtain an adjudication that the plaintiff was seized of and entitled to an undivided one-half interest in certain real property.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The evidence in this case is sufficient to support the conclusion, evidently reached by the learned court at Special Term, that on or about the 1st day of May, 1895, at the borough of Brooklyn, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a verbal agreement for the purchase of premises known as Nos. 23 and 25 Tiffany place, Brooklyn ; that the plaintiff and defendant contributed an equal amount of money to a fund for the purchase-, of this property, which was to be subject to the mortgages then a lien thereon, and that the said property was to be enjoyed in common between plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canda v. . TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Black v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Veeder v. HorstmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Thomas v. RobbertNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Flaum v. Kaiser Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API