Veeder v. Horstmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Charles F. Horstmann and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff,, entered in the office of the clerk of the.county of Schenectady on the 29th day of December, 1902, upon the decision of the court,, rendered after a trial before the court without a jury at the Schenectady Trial Term, directing the specific performance of a contract for the lease of real property.
1Opinion of the Court
Chase, J.:
In April, 1901, the defendant Charles F. Horstmann and others, in contemplation of associating together in a lumber business in the city of Schenectady, had frequent meetings and discussed the place in which' to locate the business, the construction of the buildings and other details. Different pieces of real property on which to- ■ locate the business were examined, and said Horstmann for several days negotiated for the real property' described in the complaint, and from time to time talked with his associates in relation thereto. A few days after, he informed his associates that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cooley v. . LobdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Canda v. . TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Traphagen v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Murphy v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Young v. . OverbaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCartney v. TitsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Haug v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1914
- 30 Carmine LLC v. DepierroCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- 28 Mott St. Co. v. Summit Import Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969