Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 15, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

This is an appeal by the planning board of Hingham (board) from a judgment of the Superior Court (G. L. c. 41, § 81BB) annulling a decision of the board which had refused an “approval not required” endorsement under G. L. c. 41, § 81P. We affirm.

The plan submitted by the plaintiff landowner divided a 17.74 acre parcel on Lazell Street in Hingham into five lots. The parties had stipulated that Lazell Street is a public way “used by the public and maintained by the Town of Hingham,” that the zoning requirements in that zone for single family resi*417dences are “40,000 square feet in area and 150…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. North Landers Corp. v. Planning Board of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Rettig v. Planning Board of RowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Smalley v. Planning Board of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Ball v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Hobbs Brook Farm Property Co. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Nasca v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API