Hutchinson v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
This is an appeal by the planning board of Hingham (board) from a judgment of the Superior Court (G. L. c. 41, § 81BB) annulling a decision of the board which had refused an “approval not required” endorsement under G. L. c. 41, § 81P. We affirm.
The plan submitted by the plaintiff landowner divided a 17.74 acre parcel on Lazell Street in Hingham into five lots. The parties had stipulated that Lazell Street is a public way “used by the public and maintained by the Town of Hingham,” that the zoning requirements in that zone for single family resi*417dences are “40,000 square feet in area and 150…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- North Landers Corp. v. Planning Board of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Rettig v. Planning Board of RowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Smalley v. Planning Board of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Ball v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Hobbs Brook Farm Property Co. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Nasca v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.