Legal Opinion

Anastasi v. RENT CONTROL BOARD OF CAMBRIDGE

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 12, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The issue before us grew out of an undisputed sequence of events which may be summarized briefly (dates are unimportant). The plaintiff (owner) purchased a four-unit rent controlled building at 70 Mount Vernon Street, Cambridge, and she moved into one unit on the third floor. After the tenants in the second-floor unit below moved out, the owner renovated the two units by creating direct internal access from the second-floor unit to the third and by converting a kitchen in the latter to a bedroom. The combined units were thereafter occupied by the owner and another. The tenants in two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Martin v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Swampscott Education Ass'n v. Town of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Lamb v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slade v. MclaughlinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Vincent v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Wheeler v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Boston Rent Equity Board v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSBMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API