Legal Opinion
United States v. a Quantity of Gold Jewelry
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 3, 1974No. Civ. 73-2839-RPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REAL, District Judge.
Basing its claim for relief on an alleged denial of due process arising out of the government’s seizure of its property pursuant to the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, § 603, 19 U.S.C. § 1603, Charles Naywert, Ltd., (hereinafter Naywert), the claimant herein, has moved the court for an order granting summary judgment on its behalf. Such a judgment would serve, if granted, to return to Naywert a quantity of gold jewelry, worth in excess of $140,000, which was confiscated by the government on January 21, 1972 and which now forms the basis…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ivers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury, Serial Number 237590Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- United States v. One 1970 Ford Pickup, Serial No. F10yrg53615, License No. 73888e, Its Tools and AppurtenancesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sawyer v. GableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. One (1) Ford Van EconolineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.