Legal Opinion

Richard v. McGreevy

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2008No. Nos. 06-CV-1056, 06-CV-1057 and 07-PR-1411Published

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

After the death of Ted Wolfe, doctors and lawyers who alleged that they provided medical and legal services to him prior to his death sought payment for these claims by Mr. Wolfe’s estate. In these consolidated appeals, these doctors and lawyers challenge the Probate Division’s dismissal of their complaints filed after the estate disallowed their claims and the Civil Division’s dismissal of their consolidated complaints.1

Appellants allege that (1) the Superior Court’s Probate and Civil Divisions erred in respectively dismissing their consolidated complaints…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Chamberlain v. American Honda Finance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. District of Columbia v. GanttDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Matter of Estate of PhillipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Morfessis v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API