Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1985No. 83-469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

470 U.S. 1 (1985)

UNITED STATES

v.

YOUNG

No. 83-469.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 2, 1984

Decided February 20, 1985

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Michael W. McConnell argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Assistant Attorney General Trott, Deputy Solicitor General Frey, and Louis M. Fischer.

Burck Bailey argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · BurgerChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari to review the reversal of respondent's conviction because of prosecutorial comments responding to defense…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited61 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Sierra Pacific IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  3. United States v. Steven YamashiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API