Legal Opinion
Saul v. Saul
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 21, 1941No. 7246PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff, appellant here, sued to annul his marriage to defendant, asserting that she was incompetent to enter the marital relation. The basis for the claim is the alleged invalidity of a Tennessee divorce, which she secured three days before the marriage, from Mr. Gardner, a former husband who remains living at the present time. By cross bill Mrs. Saul sought separate maintenance for herself and their adopted infant son and the custody of the child. The decree was in her favor as to annulment, maintenance and custody of the son.
The principal issues relate to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Swift v. SwiftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Ruppert v. RuppertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Oliver v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.