State v. Meredith
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In this criminal case, we must decide whether, under the circumstances here, the attachment and monitoring of an electronic tracking device (“transmitter”) to a truck that defendant’s government employer owned constituted a “search” under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. In affirming the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence derived from the use of the transmitter, the Court of Appeals held that neither the attachment nor the subsequent monitoring of the transmitter had amounted to a search under Article I, section 9. State v. Meredith, 184 Or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TinerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FulmerOregon Supreme Court · 2020
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.