Legal Opinion

State v. Tiner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. CC 10-95-11814; SC S47643PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This case is before us on automatic and direct appeal of defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentences of death. We have considered defendant’s assignments of error and conclude that the trial court erred only in the form of the judgment. We therefore affirm the convictions and the sentences, but reverse in part and remand this case to the trial court for the limited purpose of correcting the form of the judgment.

I. FACTS

Because the jury found defendant guilty, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 250, 971 P2d 879, cert den, 527 US…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. DE JESUS VERDIN v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API