State v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Defendant was convicted of one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, a misdemeanor. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial. Defendant argues that the state failed to bring defendant to trial within a “reasonable period of time” as required by ORS 135.747. For the following reasons, we affirm.
We are bound by the trial court’s findings of fact so long as there is evidence in the record to support those findings. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). We review the trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BerrellezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014