Howell v. C. M. Allen & Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHedeiCK, J.
The appellant assigns as error the court’s overruling his motions for judgment as of nonsuit. All the evidence considered in its light most favorable to the plaintiff tended to show that in the month of January 1966 the defendant was engaged in placing underground conduit lines for Southern Bell in the City of Goldsboro, North Carolina, and that the plaintiff went to the site of the job and dis cussed with one E. 0. Bradshaw, an employee of the defendant, the possibility that the plaintiff might bid on some concrete work. Bradshaw informed the plaintiff that Barrus Construction Company of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Goeckel v. StokelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Leffew v. OrrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mayo v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Smith v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gunn v. Lab. Corp. of Am.North Carolina Business Court · 2014
- Langley v. Autocraft, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
- Mayo v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.