United States v. Robert Bolinger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentD.W. Nelson, Circuit Judge
This case asks whether district courts may incorrectly apply the Sentencing Guidelines in plea agreements as long as they sentence under an agreed cap. Because a primary purpose of the Guidelines was to create uniformity in sentencing, see U.S.S.G. Ch. 1, Pt. A, intro, comment., I must respectfully dissent from Part II-A of a decision that allows such broad license to the district courts in contravention of the Sentencing Commission’s intent.
I. ADDITIONAL FACTS
I first think it important to note a few facts that the majority’s opinion has omitted. The initial plea agreement into which the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.