Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Robert Bolinger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1991No. 90-10305Published

1DissentD.W. Nelson, Circuit Judge

This case asks whether district courts may incorrectly apply the Sentencing Guidelines in plea agreements as long as they sentence under an agreed cap. Because a primary purpose of the Guidelines was to create uniformity in sentencing, see U.S.S.G. Ch. 1, Pt. A, intro, comment., I must respectfully dissent from Part II-A of a decision that allows such broad license to the district courts in contravention of the Sentencing Commission’s intent.

I. ADDITIONAL FACTS

I first think it important to note a few facts that the majority’s opinion has omitted. The initial plea agreement into which the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API