Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Chas. A. Krause Milling Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 22, 1945No. Civil Action No. 1553PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
On January 10, 1945, this court set for trial the preliminary issue raised by the paragraph in the answer alleging this action was brought without the knowledge, consent, or approval of the plaintiff as administrator of O.P.A.
At said hearing the attorneys for plaintiff admitted that Chester Bowles, the Administrator of the O.P.A., had no knowledge personally of the commencement of this action. However, Second Revised General Order No. 3, effective September 7, 1944, which was subsequent to the date this action was commenced, was received in evidence. This order conferred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Rabkin v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Safeway Stores v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowles v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Tartak v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Warner and Swasey Company v. HeldDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1966
- Wirtz v. Atlantic States Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Tartak v. District Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.