Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Harriman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 17, 1995No. 94-1218PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case. The appellee, Douglas Harriman, underwent surgery to correct scoliosis, and was left paralyzed from the chest down following the procedure. He brought suit against the appellant, Dr. James Aronson, the orthopedic surgeon who performed the procedure, and certain named malpractice insurance carriers. The case proceeded to trial against separate defendant Dr. Aronson on the issues of negligent medical care and treatment, and on Dr. Aronson’s alleged failure to obtain Mr. Harriman’s informed consent to the procedure. The jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Quinney v. PittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Willson Safety Products v. EschenbrennerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caplener v. Bluebonnet Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Eady v. LansfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Ashe v. Radiation Oncology AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Bradley T. Ex Rel. D.T. v. Central Catholic High SchoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API