Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Quinney v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1995No. 94-787PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether venue of this constructive fraud case lay in Monroe County. The trial court correctly ruled that the action was properly brought in Monroe County, and we affirm.

There is no serious dispute about where and when the determinative facts occurred. In the first part of 1992, John and Carolyn Pittman, plaintiffs, resided in Phillips County. John Pittman served as a chancellor of the First Judicial District, and Phillips County is one of the five counties in the district. Judge Pittman was elected to the Arkansas Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Allred v. DemuthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Mikel v. HubbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Callahan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BeaversSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. City of Maumelle v. Jeffrey Sand Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Aronson v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Wade v. GraceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API