Legal Opinion

Graphic Packaging, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Graphic Packaging, Inc. (Employer) and George Zink (Claimant) have filed cross-petitions for review of the May 3, 2006, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to award benefits to Claimant for a closed period and to grant Claimant’s penalty petition. We affirm in part, and we reverse in part.

Employer hired Claimant, a Vietnam War veteran, as a maintenance mechanic pursuant to the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (Veterans’ Act). 1 During his military service,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority v. WCAB (Modesto)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. City of Philadelphia v. WCAB (Thompson)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Consolidation Coal Company and East Coast Risk Management v. WCAB (Albani)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. E. McGuire v. WCAB (Swift Transportation and ESIS Northeast WC Claims)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Essix Holdings, LLC v. M. Dengel (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API