Legal Opinion

Boston Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 17, 2004PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether, consistent with G. L. c. 32, the retirement systems and pensions statute, the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), may define “earned income” for purposes of G. L. c. 32, § 91A, to include a distribution of corporate profits to a salaried shareholder-employee. We conclude that PERAC may so define “earned income” and affirm the decision of the Superior Court in this matter.

1. Background. The relevant facts are not in dispute. In 1978, the Boston Retirement Board (retirement board) granted accidental disability retirement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charland v. Muzi Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Flemings v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Moran v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arlington Contributory Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Foresta v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Pulsone v. Public Employee Retirement Administration CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Massachusetts Teachers' Retirement System v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Haverhill Retirement System v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API