Legal Opinion
DiJoseph v. Vuotto
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 1997No. Civil Action 95-1803PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew DiJoseph (“DiJoseph”) brings this Motion for a New Trial after the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Officer Carmen Vuotto (“Vuotto”). DiJoseph alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment for excessive force after suffering injuries when Vuotto shot him on September 22, 1993, during a confrontation between DiJoseph and police officers from the City of Philadelphia. DiJoseph enumerates a myriad of reasons for a new trial. Among them, DiJoseph claims that (1) admission of DiJoseph’s state court guilty plea of aggravated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ronald Jarrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Larry D. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Robert Anthony Hickey, United States v. William Lloyd FerreiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Sanabria v. MartinsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- M.B. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Lynch v. DucasseDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020