Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Mazda Motors of America

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 31, 1992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

There are two questions involved in this appeal: (1) Where, under the state’s Lemon Law, Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-24-201, et seq., the trial judge orders the manufacturer to take back an automobile and refund the sales price to the purchaser, may the trial judge also award damages against the dealer? and (2) Did the dealer’s agent make actionable misrepresentations to the purchaser concerning the automobile? We answer both questions in the affirmative and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

On October 12, 1988, the plaintiff purchased a Mazda RX-7 with 14,582 miles on it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simmons Et Ux. v. Evans Et UxTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Lonning v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. B. F. Myers & Son of Goodlettsville, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. Barnes v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Goodale v. LangenbergCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. Wimley v. RudolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Forbes v. Wilson County Emergency District 911 BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API