People ex rel. S. H.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal from an order of adjudication of dependency and neglect and a decree of disposition terminating appellant-mother’s parental rights. We reverse and remand.
During oral argument, appellant contended that the standard of proof required for an adjudication of dependency and neglect and termination of parental rights is “clear and convincing evidence” rather than the preponderance of the evidence standard prescribed by statute and our decisions. SDCL 26-8-22.10; Matter of L. M. T., 305 N.W.2d 399 (S.D.1981). Appellant’s contention is based upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People ex rel. S.L.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- People in Interest of SHSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- In re B.R.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of B.R.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. A. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.