Legal Opinion

Reickhoff v. Consolidated Gas Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1950No. 8929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

Action for an accounting for the natural gas .produced and sold from a well drilled by the defendant, Consolidated Gas Company, a corporation, on lands on which the plaintiff E. O. Reickhoff, held a valid oil and gas lease, and to enjoin the defendant from taking gas therefrom or in any manner interfering with plaintiff’s possession. Judgment was entered, ordering defendant to account, awarding plaintiff the amount found due and adjudging plaintiff’s lease to be wholly terminated as of midnight, March 1, 1946.

From that part of the judgment ordering an accounting and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. Homestake Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Greer v. Carter Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pentress Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Edington v. Creek Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hanson v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of SaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API