Legal Opinion
Smith v. Board of Public Utilities
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 17, 1999No. Civ. A. 97-2352-KHVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s Motion for Summai"y Judgment (Doc. # 31) filed June 23, 1998. Plaintiffs Don Smith and Benell Davis have filed a response to the motion and defendant, the Board of Public Utilities for the City of Kansas City, Kansas [BPU], has filed its reply. The matter is now ready for ruling. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court finds that defendant’s motion should be sustained for the reasons set forth below.
I. Factual Background
With respect to BPU’s motion for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Metzger v. City of LeawoodDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Stubbs v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Campbell v. Meredith Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Meiners v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Budenz v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.