Legal Opinion
Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. v. Amaya
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 13, 2016No. 13-2866 & 13-1036PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Clarification
2Per curiam
We grant Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc.’s motion for clarification, withdraw this Court’s previous opinion dated March 2, 2016, and issue this opinion in its stead.
Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. (“Caterpillar”), appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Rudolf Amaya following a jury’s verdict awarding Amaya back pay and front pay on his claim that Caterpillar unlawfully retaliated against him for filing a workers’ compensation claim in violation of section 440.205, Florida Statutes (2008) (“retaliation claim”). Because the record demonstrates that…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Charles A. Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a Corporation, Chris Papastrat, Shelby Bass v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Barbara C. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- O'Neal v. Fla. a & M University Ex Rel. Bd. of TrusteesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Salomon v. Ezcorp, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Baez v. B&B Tire of Fowler, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Bethune v. SBE ENT Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022