Legal Opinion

People v. Falciglia

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As the Appellate Division properly concluded, defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424). The issue of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact and, inasmuch as there is evidence in the record to support the lower courts’ determina tion, this court’s review is at an end (see, People v Castro, 70 NY2d 943, 945). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. CastroNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. VaneikenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. CannellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API