Commonwealth v. Firman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence seized by an Allegheny County Port Authority Transit (PAT) Officer following the warrantléss arrest of Appellee for violating the motor vehicle code. The suppression court determined that the PAT officer did not have jurisdiction to arrest Appellee and suppressed the evidence. In so ruling, the suppression court relied primarily on this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Mundorf, 699 A.2d 1299 (Pa.Super.1997) (per curiam). On appeal, the Commonwealth argues that the PAT officer was empowered to arrest…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Dole v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pro Design, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Commonwealth v. QuaidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. FirmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. BloomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Green, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.