Legal Opinion
Dole v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1940No. Appeals, 152 and 153PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree of the court below dismissing plaintiff’s bill is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Oliver. Costs to be paid by the City of Philadelphia.
Order on Petition to Withhold Return oe Record and Supplemental Opinion,
Per Curiam,
We have considered the petition to withhold the return of the record for an additional period of thirty days and are of opinion that the public interest requires that the petition be and it hereby is dismissed.
When this case was argued, our attention was not called by counsel to Sections' 12, 14 and 15 of the recent Act of June 27, 1939, P. L.…
2Cited by66 opinions
- Brown v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Allentown School District Mercantile Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- AMIDON v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Allegheny County v. MonzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Brooks Building Tax Assessment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.