Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 30, 1985No. Civ. A. 76-4564-GPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GARRITY, District Judge.

I. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendants Eli Lilly and Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., and Merck & Company, Inc. have filed motions to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint which arises out of the alleged ingestion by plaintiff’s mother of diethylstilbestrol (“DES”) or DES-related compounds or congenors during the pregnancy which resulted in plaintiff’s birth on April 27, 1955. Plaintiff alleges that on or about April, 1974, she developed vaginal adenosis, pre-eancerous lesions in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. Shackil v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Conley v. Boyle Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API