Legal Opinion
McClintic-Marshall Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 3, 1936No. 1784PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
In 1931, Ed Pettus entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission for the construction of four bridges on a state highway in Leon county for the contract price of $80,735.48. Maryland Casualty Company was surety for Pettus on his performance bond. Said bond bound the contractor and his surety to a faithful performance of the contract and, among other.things, provided that they should “pay all lawful claims for labor performed and material furnished in and about the construction of said bridges- * * p01. t2ie purpose of indemnifying Maryland Casualty Company…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Bonding Co. v. Regents of UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. CornwallOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- W. H. Putegnat Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Laski v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrientos v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Barrientos v. Government of CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969