Reina v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The Narcotic Control Act of 1956,1 18 U. S. C. § 1406, legislates immunity from prosecution for a witness compelled under the section by court order to testify before a federal grand jury investigating alleged violations of the federal narcotics laws. The questions presented are, primarily, whether the section grants immunity from *509state, as well as federal, prosecution, and, if state immunity, whether the section is constitutional.
The petitioner was serving a five-year sentence for a federal narcotics offense2 when, on December 5, 1958, he was subpoenaed before a federal grand jury sitting in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.