Legal Opinion

Reina v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 19, 1960No. 29PublishedCited by 202 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The Narcotic Control Act of 1956,1 18 U. S. C. § 1406, legislates immunity from prosecution for a witness compelled under the section by court order to testify before a federal grand jury investigating alleged violations of the federal narcotics laws. The questions presented are, primarily, whether the section grants immunity from *509state, as well as federal, prosecution, and, if state immunity, whether the section is constitutional.

The petitioner was serving a five-year sentence for a federal narcotics offense2 when, on December 5, 1958, he was subpoenaed before a federal grand jury sitting in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API