Legal Opinion

People v. Manning

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1983No. 83SA258PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

The People appeal a Ruling and Order of the Boulder District Court suppressing certain statements of the defendant, Elizabeth Manning, as well as all evidence gathered by the police before and after those statements were made. C.A.R. 4.1. We agree that the statements were obtained as a result of a promise made to the defendant and must therefore be suppressed. Under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, all evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements must also be suppressed. 1 We disagree, however, with the trial court’s conclusion that all evidence gathered…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API