Legal Opinion

Kaminski v. Great Camp Knights of Modern Maccabees

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1906No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Anthony Kaminski against the Great Camp of the Knights of the Modern Maccabees for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

It is the claim of plaintiff that while undergoing initiation at the Belle Isle Tent of the Knights of the Modern Maccabees he received personal injuries. He brought suit and recovered judgment. The case is brought here by writ of error.

Plaintiff bases his right to recover against defendant upon the proposition that the relation of principal and agent exists between defendant order and the degree team of Belle Isle Tent, so as to make the former liable for the negligent, careless, or willful acts of the latter, resulting *17in injury to him during the initiation. In the declaration it is said:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joslin v. Grand Rapids Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Keating v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Jumper v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of WorldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904
  4. Wiltse v. State Road Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Supreme Lodge Loyal Order of Moose v. KennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Thompson v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the MacCabees of the WorldNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Dahlin v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Grand Temple & Tabernacle of Knights & Daughters of Tabor of the International Order of Twelve v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Grand Temple & Tabernacle of Knights & Daughters of Tabor of the International Order of Twelve v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API