Hoke v. Cullinan
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERT, Justice.
The issue decided by the Court of Appeals and of which this Court granted discretionary review is whether a complaint alleging ordinary negligence is sufficient to state a claim for relief for injuries received in a sporting contest. By virtue of the trial, court’s dismissal of the case and the Court of Appeals’ reversal, we must also decide whether the evidence precluded summary judgment, and whether the trial court acted prematurely.
What transpired between the parties is essentially undisputed. Appellant and appel-lee were engaged in a doubles tennis match, and at the time…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- City of Florence, Kentucky v. ChipmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Red Hed Oil, Inc. v. H.T. Hackney Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.