Legal Opinion
People v. Honeckman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
The Attorney-General of this State seeks to bar these defendants from engaging in the securities business in the State of New York (General Business Law, § 353, subd 1). The present application is for an injunction pendente lite. A broad injunction restraining the defendants from all activities relating to the sale of securities was granted ex parte pending this hearing.
The defendants were indicted and charged with 35 counts of grand larceny, violation of section 359-e of the General Business Law (selling securities without a license), and violation of section 352-c of the General Business…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Federated Radio CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People v. F. H. Smith Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- People v. Cadplaz Sponsors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Able Cycle Engines, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Bonacorsa v. LindtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. HoneckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1991