Legal Opinion

People v. Honeckman

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eugene R. Wolin, J.

On June 3, 1977, an order was entered pursuant to article 23-A of the General Business Law (§ 352 et seq., the Martin Act) which permanently enjoined defendant Seymour Vall from engaging in any capacity in any business relating to the purchase and sale of securities in this State. Vall now moves for an order dissolving or modifying that decree.

In April, 1973, Vall became employed as a salesman for a commodities brokerage firm known as Collins and Day. That firm ceased operations some time in June, 1973, with substantial losses to its clients. Thereafter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. People v. Federated Radio CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API