Knox v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff Michel Knox brings a Complaint against defendant City of Portland asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Oregon law. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [40] and oral argument was heard on February 8, 2008. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted in part, and denied in part.
Defendant also moves to strike [70] various portions of the affidavits of plaintiff, Sean Rumpel, Gudrun Free, and Dr. Gina Bullock. In summary judgment…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noga v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Hughes v. Pacific UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Xu v. Lightsmyth Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025