Legal Opinion

Knox v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 5, 2008No. Civil 06-459-HAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

HAGGERTY, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Michel Knox brings a Complaint against defendant City of Portland asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Oregon law. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [40] and oral argument was heard on February 8, 2008. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted in part, and denied in part.

Defendant also moves to strike [70] various portions of the affidavits of plaintiff, Sean Rumpel, Gudrun Free, and Dr. Gina Bullock. In summary judgment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noga v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  2. Hughes v. Pacific UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  3. Xu v. Lightsmyth Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API