Legal Opinion

Isaak v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1968No. 9216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice:

In a hearing before us, we granted the petition of Eugene Isaak for a writ of certiorari. Whether a co-executor named in a will, incompetent to serve solely because he is not a bona fide resident of this state, has the right to nominate an administrator with will annexed is the principal issue of the case.

The facts are as follows: Blenda H. Fast died testate on September 8, 1967, leaving an estate valued at about $500,000.-00. Named as co-executors in her will were Jerome W. Sinsheimer, an attorney practicing in New York, his son Warren J. Sinsheimer, named as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Dolenty's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. In Re Estate of DaleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cerny v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Kinnear v. FineganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Amator v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API