Legal Opinion

Keane v. Allen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1949No. 7467PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

We have here two separate appeals in a proceeding to set aside -by motion on the ground of extrinsic fraud, -a judgment of dismissal of an action. The background is briefly as follows:

On June 25, 1947, respondent Keane for himself as a partner and in the interests of the partnership creditors, brought suit against appellant J. A. Allen, as the other partner, for a partnership dissolution and accounting.

The remaining appellants along with the defendant, B. W. Porter, were named as parties to the action in order that a complete accounting might be had of the partnership affairs…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Furman v. . FurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Donovan v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sharp v. Idaho Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Johnson v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re Estate of WestNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gregory v. HancockIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API