Legal Opinion

Grashaw v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Baraga; Haire, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Thomas Grashaw against Robert Wilson, principal, and John Falk and others, sureties, upon an appeal bond. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

In April, 1896, the plaintiff executed a lease in writing to Robert Wilson and Herman Falk of certain premises in said lease described for hotel and saloon purposes, at a rental of $100 per month. The lease does not state the day of the month when it was executed. The lessees entered into possession, and in February, 1897, the rent being in arrears, the plaintiff commenced proceedings before a circuit court commissioner against both lessees for restitution of the premises. March 2, 1897, judgment of restitution was rendered by the commissioner. Robert Wilson alone appealed from this judgment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Holcomb v. BonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Estey Manufacturing Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Vickers v. American Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Kibler v. CaplisMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API