Legal Opinion

Estey Manufacturing Co. v. Runnels

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit on appeal-bond given under forcible detainer act. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Plaintiff, having purchased on execution the equity of redemption of certain property in Shiawassee county owned by defendant Runnels, and previously mort*311gaged to Mrs. Eva Passmore, brought statutory proceedings before a commissioner to obtain possession, and got judgment of possession, which was appealed, and finally came from the circuit court of Shiawassee county to this Court, where it was affirmed.1 The present suit is on the appeal-bond for rent during the time plaintiff was kept out.

It was the usual statutory bond, which provided that,—

“If the above-bounden Carlton K.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estey Manufacturing Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Holcomb v. BonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Grashaw v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API