Sebring v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order denying a motion of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco for a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The action was brought to recover damages for the wrongful and false arrest and imprisonment of plaintiff caused and procured by defendant.
Among other things it is alleged in the complaint “That on the 22nd day of June, 1907, at the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, the defendant caused the plaintiff to be arrested upon a pretended charge of larceny.”
Defendant in his answer denied that he “caused the plaintiff to be arrested upon a pretended charge of larceny, or upon any other charge.”
At the close…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. McGrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Loring v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- MacKie v. Ambassador Hotel & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.