Legal Opinion

Lau v. Lau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

The question transferred is whether the marriage of a feeble-minded person, entered into in violation of the statutory prohibition, is void or only voidable! The statute upon the subject prohibits the marriage, under certain circumstances, but does not declare that it shall be void. Laws 1915, c. 161. It is the general rule in this country that a mere statutory prohibition of a certain marriage does not render it void unless the statute so declares. Gould v. Gould, 78 Conn. 242; Cunningham v. Cunningham, 206 N. Y. 341, 344; 18 R. C. L. 440.

When the language of this act is compared with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Simpson v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Musgrove a v. Winthrop Parker A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. In Re the Estate of HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API